The Name of War Essay -- Essays Papers

The Name of WarIn this historical and culturally separate book, Jill Lepore examines and tries to define the King Philips War and how people wrote about it. At the commencement exercise of the colonies it was a start of a in the raw England and subsequently the King Philips War with all of the ghostly conflicts and fight stories, a new American identity was born. Throughout this book she tells gruesome tales about murders, massacres, and battles. Even purpose his book jumps a lot in chronically order she successfully tells the tales for both sides pretty accurately. I enjoyed reading some parts of this book. particularly the beginning and the middle because I thought the End dropped off and slowed down. commencement even before the war begins, she tells the tale of John Sassamon which she uses as the priming of ideas. This is a center point of the first part of her book. Why Sassamon was both killed for no reason or assassinated? New England Indians at the quantify were t o become accustom to English sounds and some were even converting to Christianity. Soon after(prenominal) the war begins she shows how the Indians use Christianity as a part of their war. Also after the war begins she writes about how many writers try to capture the war in words so that the colonies dont subject their Englishness. This is ironic because by trying non to loose their Englishness they form an American identity.Inside the John Sassamon story lays the line up reason wherefore he was killed. Sassamon was an educated man, which was very r atomic number 18 considering he was a inborn American. Even though he was growing unconnected from some of his friends in the colonies he still had strong ties with them. There are many reasons why he would be killed but nvirtuoso as strong as turn on your own people. Treason is considered a great offence to our country, imagine the offence taken by the Native Americans. Reading this book I found great similarities with the Nativ e American culture and one with a gang or a syndicate family. All of them seem to slang great penalties for one of their own turning against them. The major difference would be that the Native Americans religion was also a great deal of their culture. A mob familys religion (catholic or instance) would conflict with the killing of another human. But the Native Americans were not that way, if one was killed and they took hostages then the one killed could be revenged by killing a hostage.... ...re not doing any of the torturing and only watching they dont loose their ties with the mother land. This was completely wrong, the Colonists were there not the English. The English might have read about it somewhere in a newspaper or a book but the Colonists had to live through it. This is the reason why the Colonists lost their Englishness and began a new American identity.Lepore also used writers of that eon to distinguish between how they told their truth and what she thought was the t ruth. This was a very recyclable part of the book, it showed to us the reader, that not all the stories that we read about the in history books or books from that time are entirely correct. That in each writing there is some type of biases ness. She did a very good job on representing both sides very well.This book was the study of war and how people wrote about it. But also the book makes it apparently make believe that this was the start of a new American identity. Throughout the writings, stories, and all of the religious battles that were fought one true thing remained the colonists Englishness was gone. This was not New England any more this was something new. This was a New New England.