A Comparison between the Hindu Gods of Good and Evil Essay

In Hindooism, the primary destination of an individual is to procure the so-called Nirvana or becoming matchless with divinity fudge. Nirvana connotes the transcendence of the hu service part mettle to the Oneness of the miraculous animation (Hemenway, 2003). Hence, some(prenominal) Hindis practice a variety of evolved rituals and esoteric practices to enable their spirit to adapt to the noble essence. The hope of spiritual transcendence given by Nirvana became the basis for establishment or conceptualization of piece of musicy gods in the Hindu religion. These gods ar basically derivatives of the One God the One God being stand for in all aspects of nature (Hemenway, 2003).Thus, in regularise to simulate the specific characteristics of this God, Hindus focus on worshipping all the mental representations of this God. In general, the Hindu religion speaks of about 300 major and lesser gods. The primary triad gods are k right awayn as the Holy Trinity. Brahma is the creator Vishnu is the life pre marchr (pattern-maker) and Shiva, the bring downer. The three are inseparable from each other. In ordain for creation to proceed, at that fall out must be a period of destruction. In order for destruction to occur, a period of preservation must happen (prior).Thus, the being of the three gods presents a vivid description of the Hindus principle on the existence of man. If man is to be born, he must be preserved from the impediments of bad life and savage, and he must face the reality of destruction. To be born is to be created to be preserved is to be de full termine from the d diabolicishs of daily active to die is to acknowledge the origin of the charitable spirit. except in this way that the human spirit would be able to achieve Nirvana (transcendence of the human spirit to the bode essence).Thus, Hindus hold on the assertion that once man is born (and reborn) in this world, on that point are powers who would turn over and misguid e him to attain Nirvana. The guiding powers are basically the gods of corking. The powers misguiding man to his full-strength purpose are the gods of mephistophelean. This is though unlike the Christian conception of healthy and lousiness. Evil here is not seen as non-functional. Rather it serves as a unmistakable of test during the preservation period of mans being that is, the necessity to achieve Nirvana. Good here is seen something as an end that is, the representation of Nirvana on earth.We can therefore assume that the conception of inviolable and offensive is a rectification of ideological misconceptions in the Hindu religion. The inaugural clarification is concerning the source of proficient and flagitious. It is quite clear in Hindu religion that both exhaustively and evil gods came from the same source. Evil is the sexual sexual perversion of in force(p). In order for evil to exist, good must first light into existence. The second clarification states good g ods are lots transformed into evil gods as they experience strange circumstances. The conception connotes the existence of One Divine Essence delineate as both good and evil in nature.Evil is not a natural phenomenon, it springs from the Divine Essence serve as a test to humanity. Thus, when we compare Hindu gods of good and evil, impress note that we are essentially talking of functional departure. This functional difference is manifested in the perceived roles of the gods in nature. The Hindu gods of good are represented in things perceived by the Hindus as rudiments of a good life. For example, Ganesha is much described as a god of good because he bestows good fortune to those seeking his favor. Specifically, he is considered the source of prosperity and riches for Hindus.Some call Ganesha the Lord of Good Fortune and the Destroyer of Obstacles. Often, Hindus prop their economic and social well-being to the hands of Ganesha. Added to that, because man is located in a bo dily world full of dangers and obstacles, he continuously offer his divine guidance to man. Hence, he is sometimes called the god of wisdom and judgment in Hinduism. Ganesha is seen as a good god who bestows his wisdom and divine intellect to man in order for him (man) to attain Nirvana. Frankly speaking, he is seen by many Hindus as the source of hope and aspiration.Besides Ganesha, there are three other gods considered to be good by many Hindus. Durga is a goddess representing the power of the Supreme Being who maintains moral order (Hindu Gods, 2005). In Sanskrit, her name manner a fort or a place that is protected. Thus, Durga is known as the Divine Mother. In her accouterments, she protects the human race from evil by destroying the sources of evil. Like Ganesha, Lakshmi is considered a goddess of good-living and prosperity. In Sanskrit, her name literally means goal (Hindu Gods, 2005). Thus, she signifies the goals of life.These goals of life can be achieved either in th e tangible or spiritual realm. nigh Hindus pray to her for guidance. Saraswati is the goddess of knowledge, and wisdom. She is often associated with Brahma, the creator of the universe. In Sanskrit, her name means the essence of the self (Hindu Gods, 2005). Hinduism puts knowledge on a higher pedestal, being the prerequisite for creation. To the Hindu worshipper, Saraswati provides guidance to humanity in accomplishing their daily tasks. Hindus believe that Saraswati, during the early part of creation, provided man with applicatory knowledge.This practical knowledge allowed man to create refinements, far greater than any in the animal kingdom. In Hinduism, there are gods considered to be the source of evil in this world. In Pauranic traditions, Asuras and Devas are the step sons of Kasyapa, an unknown god considered to be the primordial source of evil. They are considered to be lusus naturae gods projected as enemies of humanity. The Asuras (this is a group of devil gods) beca me too proud of their ancestry and power. Thus, the Devas became tempestuous over the war mongering of the Asuras and decided to punish them.The punishment though was self-serving. The Devas aspect by forcing the Asuras to serve them, they would be able to project themselves as rulers of the physical world. This view of the Asuras and Devas was expanded in Iranian mythology. Iranian mythology presented Asur Mazda as the physique of good in this world and Devas as the villain. It should be note though that in Hindu mythology, both the Asuras and the Devas are perceived as demon gods that is, gods that would take all hope from humanity in the attainment of the Nirvana.The term Asuras, unlike the terminological evolution in Iranian mythology, came to signify in later times (in Hinduism) as the representation of evil demon itself. In Hinduism, there are gods considered evil precisely because they are perceived to be enemies of the good gods and humanity in general. Vritra, for examp le, is a serpent god often called as the enemy of the gods (The Complete Book of Devils and Demons, 2005). His favorite animal, the serpent, carries the scent of death to those who would call his name. Yama is a Hindu god considered to be the lord of death.His two dogs drag humanity into the fervor of spiritual death the essence of which is the leaving of spiritual transcendence to the Divine Essence. The same is true for Ravana, the Demon power (The Complete Book of Devils and Demons, 2005). He is seen as the incarnation of evil in this world. At times, he would lure humans into his trap, forcing them to pledge loyalty to his evil result. There are also evil creatures considered to be the direct descendants of the evil gods. Kasyapa, the primordial source of evil (and the father of both the Asuras and the Devas) gave lineage to the Daityas.These are unpleasant demons who roamed the physical world to destroy mans sacrifices to the good gods. The good gods are therefore their na tural enemies. Kasyapa also gave digest to the Danavas (The Complete Book of Devils and Demons, 2005). These are creatures often disguised as man to motivate man to rebel against the good gods. These creatures (who at times became demon gods) possessed powers of persuasion and bad luck. They often seduce man to covet the properties of the gods and to stop offering sacrifices. Added to that, they also offer their services to the primary evil gods in their fight against the good gods.The good gods are sometimes hale to seek refuge to other places in order to avoid the irritation of these demonic creatures. In the end, however, the good gods succeed in defeating these evil creatures (in trammel with the evil gods). There are also other entities described as evil in the Hindu religion. The Darbas are destructive that tears human flesh (hence the name, tearers). The Rakshasas are goblins and ghouls which descended from the foot of Brahma. They can be titans or as little as a cat that haunt cemeteries and other ghostly places.They disturb sacrifices, animate the dead, eat people, and spread disease and disorder. These creatures often serve the evil gods in their fight against the good gods. In sum, evil goods in the Hindu religion are either the enemies of the gods and humanity or those which close out humanity from attaining Nirvana. These gods descended from the three primary gods (Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva).At times, they trace their ancestry to good gods. This explains the proposition stated earlier that the good is the prerequisite of evil. Added to that, some evil Hindu gods (like the Asuras and the Devas) in Hinduism present their identity as the result of perversion on the part of the good gods. Take note that the good gods are not by nature good. Like in Greek mythology, Hindu gods are often involved in intrigues that affect their functions as gods. At times, even the good gods struggle against each other for supremacy. Only when the affright of evil becomes preeminent, the good Hindu gods join forces to defeat the evil gods. Most of the time, they achieve success. At some time, they flee from the hordes of the evil gods.We come now to the discussion of the primary differences of Hindu gods of good and evil. As stated earlier, the main difference between these gods can be derived from the concept of functionality. Hindu gods of good are represented as the good rudiments of nature (and mans guidance in attaining Nirvana). Hindu gods of evil are essentially the images of a corrupt humanity. This corruption is the ultimate obstacle (and often irreversible) of man in attaining Nirvana. There are though specific differences between these sets of deities. present are as follows ) Culturally speaking, the Hindu gods of good are often associated with the mystical founders of Hindu civilization (Hemenway, 2003).For example, in the Vedic manuscripts the ancient founders of the Indus civilization are often given divine attributes. These gods are the progenitors of practical and divine knowledge to the people. The evil gods are often associated with the invaders that is, the barbarians who destroyed the Indus civilization and conventional the caste system (note that the caste system is functional in the eyeball of a Hindu this connotes that evil itself is functional in some ways) ) The good gods are often represented as the symbols of perpetuity and healthy living (Hemenway, 2003). Animals such as the elephant, cow, and rat are associated with the good gods because of their dual symbol of power and humility the very virtues that humanity adheres to.The evil gods are represented by serpent, monkey (symbol of arrogance and maliciousness), and in some cases the vulture symbols of moulder and corruption of the human spirit. Take note however that these creatures are prise in the Hindu religion because evil is seen as a manifest test of humanity in achieving Nirvana ) Lastly, the good gods are ordinarily are repres ented as bringers of justice and love to humanity. The eight arms of Ganesha symbolize love for humanity. The swords loaded to arms of Ganesha symbolize justice and his will to protect humanity from evil powers. The evil gods carry weapons that aim to destroy and misguide humanity. We must though take note that there is no sharp demarcation between good and evil (Abhedananda and Math, 2007). In Vedanta philosophy, there is no such thing as a natural good. all action can be viewed as either good or bad depending on the one who views it. Thus, it can be said that all(prenominal) action, whether backed by good or bad motives, is covered with its opposite, as fire is enveloped with smoke (Abhedananda and Math, 2007). Thus to assume that the good gods in the Hindu religion are naturally good is a misconception. It is often noted some good gods gave birth to evil ones. This instance indicate that evil is the offspring of good.