пятница, 15 марта 2019 г.

Economic Interpretaion (C. A. Beard) :: essays research papers

Charles whiskerss "Economic" InterpretationIn 1913, Charles A. Beard (1913 1935) consolidated diverse scholarly views of the Constitution and, in the process, offered what became identified as "the" economical meter reading of the Constitution. Beard (pp. 16-18) argued that the formation of the Constitution was a conflict based upon competing economic interests - interests of both the proponents and opponents. In his view, the Federalists, the fo on a lower floors who supported a strong, centralized government and raise the Constitution during its drafting and ratification, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to personal property. They were principally merchants, shippers, bankers, speculators, and private and public securities holders, according to Beard (pp. 31-51). The Anti-federal officialists, the opponents of the Constitution and supporters of a more decentralized government, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to real property. Beard (pp. 26-30) contended these opponents consisted in general of more isolated, less-commercial farmers, who often were also debtors, and northern manorial planters along the Hudson River. However, Beard (pp. 29-30) maintained that many southern slave owning planters, who held much of their wealth in personal property, had much in common with northern merchants and financiers, and should be include as supporters of the Constitution.Beard (pp. 31-51) claimed that support for his argument could be found in the economic conditions prevailing during the 1780s. As a result, he suggested that the primary beneficiaries under the Constitution would have been individuals with commercial and financial interests - particularly, those with public securities holdings who, according to Beard, had a clause included in the Constitution requiring the assumption of existing federal debt by the new national government. Commercial and financial interests also would hit becau se of more certainty in the rules of commerce, trade, and credit markets under the Constitution.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий